2014–2017
Part I · The Origin
The flag petition, May 1 arrest, the later 2017 felony case, bond, and plea.
Pre-orders open · The true story of fighting back
A Memoir of Constitutional Warfare

The factual, first-person record of fighting back — told through lived experience, court filings, recordings, public documents, and the constitutional battles behind them.
No payment is collected yet. Your reservation is saved and checkout details will be sent when ordering opens.
A true story
A Marine’s promise
Constitutional warfare
Retaliation documented
Three federal actions
Filed in three states
The public record
Evidence before narrative
Reserve an edition
Choose your format and leave your email. Each reservation is stored as its own event, even if you have already joined the updates list.
Stay informed
Be first to know about release dates, excerpts, preorder checkout, audiobook availability, and publication news.
eBook offer
The eBook will be free with a donation of any amount. Donation fulfillment will be connected to the preorder checkout workflow.
AMERICAN INJUSTICE
A nonfiction legal-thriller memoir built in parallel with a documentary record so readers can follow the narrative with care.
CURRENT BOOK STRUCTURE
2014–2017
The flag petition, May 1 arrest, the later 2017 felony case, bond, and plea.
2018–2021
Family-court conflict, criminal accusations, evidence disputes, the 2021 DUI case, trial, appeal, and civil commitment.
2022
Oxford City Hall, the second aggravated-stalking prosecution, plea, banishment, revocation, and sentence.
2023–2025
Release from Mississippi custody, the Galveston DWI prosecution, revocation litigation, and later release.
2025–2026
Utah, Mississippi appellate litigation, New Orleans, federal proceedings, sentencing, and the continuing cost of constitutional litigation.
Reference
Legal analysis and appendices that separate the author's conclusions from the underlying documentary record.
EDITORIAL METHOD
A fact directly supported by a filing, order, official record, recording, transcript, or other identified source.
A disputed claim is identified as an allegation and attributed to the person or filing making it.
When two records disagree, the conflict is preserved rather than silently choosing the version that best fits the narrative.
Legal theories, conclusions, and personal beliefs remain distinguishable from adjudicated findings and source documents.
Later-discovered dates, amounts, names, or procedural details are corrected openly in the working source record.
PUBLICATION RULE
A strong story does not require pretending every disputed point has already been proven. Where the documentary record supports a fact, the source should be visible. Where it does not, the limitation should be visible too.